Deficit between accretion and actuality.

How can we speak of such a thing mired in these accretions such as we are? The terrifying thing is we must postulate that the actual (an accretive notion in itself, a φantasy of an self existent reality which has a manifest appearance to us, either as an impossibly accessible noumena or a scientifically accessible reality) is a mysterious base upon which the conceptual accretions accrete. Is this the admission of something beyond idealism? Only as a φantasy, one that is largely taken as reality.  The possibility that we attempt to tease out is that the informational pneuma as processed by the monad is not passive to the noumena. The observable effect of such interactions is what we tend to call weyrd.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s